![]() ![]() I'm constantly shocked at how much calmer the experience of reading a site to which sidebars, recommendations, social-media link-litter, advertising, and of course, autoplay video and audio, have been removed.ģ. Or as I put it, "Web design isn't the solution, Web design is the problem."Ģ. A whole lot of Web design is absolute crap. There are a few general observations I've made over the years:ġ. Or, in my case, turned out to be how I learned most of what I know about it -) I'll be the first to admit that this requires some knowledge of CSS. I've experimented with both general and more specific clean-up rulesets. Recent Pricing Guide I've been working through:įor what it's worth, I do this manually through a combination of uMatrix element removal and custom CSS stylesheets (applied via the Stylish CSS manager browser extension). Maybe usage based on the queue? There might be heavy crowds of users who would have a higher willingness to pay for example the "Second Brain" crowd. Hope you find a way to monetize, play around with other monetization strategies other than good-better-best or one size fits all price point. I've even disabled Firefox reader mode in favor of this. Nice extension, the more I use it the more I like it. It could decide based on other users who also saved the article, this might require storing the data on your servers, maybe number of highlights made or just ask the users when they add it to their queue. > How should it decide which article you want to re-read? You already have search on highlights and full text on them, so maybe the Memex like feature isn't needed. My usage of the service is a couple of years old so things might have changed, at the time it would crash when I did imports. Regarding the Memex like feature I did use it a lot, it worked like full text search for the HTML, they had a sync service that worked by importing your search history, I'm guessing they downloaded the HTML and stored it, so they could search against it. It might lead to an over engineered trap. Ignore the Linked text idea, in theory it is solved by the Memex like feature. That's a lot more cumbersome, and doesn't work off simple allow/deny rules on-device. This leaves us with the option of tools which are audited and certified as to behaviour, have some specifically limited sets of requests, and require those back-ends to treat any such requests in specific manners which preserve privacy and confidentiality. fails to work for any number of content blocking or tracker-blocking tools (uMatrix, Ghostery, amongst others). Limiting extension functionality to changing displayed content after an initial pre-render has been achieved. Given that I've just installed LibRedirect, which points surveillanceware sites (Twitter, YT, Reddit, Instagram, etc.) to open, less-surveilled alternatives, I'm already contradicting myself here. ![]() Limiting extension functionality to subtractive network requests, or specifically permitted requests. Limiting that would be difficult, and might require something like, spitballing here: The dynamic nature of HTML as a whole means that 1) page contents can change interactively and 2) follow-up network requests can be made. The reputational harm that this does to the company, to mobile computing, to Web 2.0, to the start-up sector, and to the infotech sector as a whole really cannot be overstated. This should not even be possible, let alone invisible to the device owner. There is Steve Krenzel's recent account of being pressured, by both a Twitter marketing exec and the phone company requesting the feature, to track "when users leave their house, their commute to work, and everywhere they go throughout the day". ![]() Why desktop, and most especially mobile platforms / operating systems fail to either distinguish or permit control between these two scenarios is. "Extension sends all page information to The Cloud^W^W Somebody Else's Computer where it is probably being shared with umpteen third parties, advertising^W behavioural manipulation and surveillance organisations, and will be preserved in crystal until the Heat Death Of The Universe. "Extension sees data on pages for which it's activated, and might modify that all kept locally", andĢ. There's also a tremendous difference between:ġ. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |